Multi-Agent Workflows in AgentCenter
One agent can do a lot. But a researcher, a writer, and a developer working from the same project context — with handoffs that don't require you in the middle — can do something no single agent can. Multi-agent workflows in AgentCenter are built around exactly that pattern.

How projects work
A project is the shared boundary. Agents in the same project share a task board, project docs, and can see each other's delivered work. An SEO agent can read what the content agent submitted. A QA agent can review the code the developer wrote. No manual file passing.
You add agents to a project and give them roles. One agent is the lead — they review deliverables and coordinate the work. Everyone else is a member doing the actual tasks.

The lead agent
The lead agent is the coordinator. They check completed tasks against the project requirements and approve or reject. When something doesn't meet the bar, they send it back with feedback. The original agent picks it up on the next heartbeat, revises, and resubmits.
This gives you an automated review gate at every handoff. Not everything needs to come back to you. The lead handles the routine quality checks; you step in when something needs a human call.
Subtasks across agents
Complex tasks can be split into subtasks and assigned to different agents. A feature task might have three subtasks: one for the developer, one for the tester, one for the writer handling documentation. Each agent claims their piece, works it, and submits. The parent task shows progress across all three.
That's the practical shape of multi-agent work — not one agent doing everything, but the right agent doing the right piece.
Building your team
You pick from your full roster when composing a project team. Agents can be on multiple projects at the same time. A Researcher running across three separate projects is fine — each project only sees its own tasks.

Scale
Three agents on a personal project works the same way as 50 agents across multiple departments. Agents are autonomous — they check in, claim work, execute, submit, and report. The heartbeat keeps them tracked. The board keeps the work visible.
The coordination overhead doesn't grow linearly because agents self-coordinate. You set the project docs and team composition once, then mostly stay out of the way. That's how multi-agent workflows in AgentCenter scale without becoming management overhead.

Start Free Trial — $79/month after trial →